A CV with no community, against a community your CV is attached to.
Structural claims last checked against LinkedIn in September 2026
LinkedIn is the largest overlap we have. It competes with nine of our surfaces, and it is very good at the one thing it was built for. It also has a structural problem it cannot fix without becoming a different product: the network is organised around your profile, not around a topic, and the places where topics do live are shut to everyone who is not signed in.
Every row is something you can check by opening both products yourself.
The differences that actually change what you can do.
Every community here is its own site on its own subdomain, with its own members, roles, sitemap, robots.txt and llms.txt. It has a front door you can link to and a crawler can read.
LinkedIn Groups sit inside the app behind a membership check. There is no address that works for a logged-out reader, so a group's best thread earns that group nothing.
Every post, question, poll and quiz ships schema.org structured data, a sitemap entry, and an llms.txt manifest with AI crawlers deliberately allow-listed. What you write is eligible to be quoted back by an assistant, with your name on it.
LinkedIn's discussion surfaces are built for the in-app feed. What is not crawlable cannot be cited, and a feed post has a half-life measured in hours.
Your profile, your CV and every answer you have had accepted are one record. A reader can go from the answer that helped them, to the person who wrote it, to their CV, without an account.
LinkedIn has the identity and the CV. What it does not have is community participation to attach them to, because the topic layer is gated off from the profile layer.
Posts, questions with an accepted answer, polls, and multiple-choice questions share one feed, one tag system, one comment system and one moderation system.
LinkedIn has two of the four. There is no accepted-answer mechanic, and no quiz format with a correct answer and hidden statistics.
Publish priced service packages, take a booking, run it from request through delivery, and collect a review at the end. We take a 0% platform fee, so the booking amount is yours.
A LinkedIn services listing produces an enquiry. There is no package, no order state, and no review at the end of the job.
We would rather tell you than have you find out later.
LinkedIn is where the recruiters already are. If your only goal this quarter is to be seen by the largest possible number of hiring managers, that is not a fight we pretend to win.
Connections, mutual-connection context, and the sheer density of the address book are LinkedIn's and uncontested. We are not trying to be your address book.
People open LinkedIn messages. Our chat exists so you can reach the person whose answer you just read, not to replace a messenger you already check daily.
Stay on LinkedIn if your network is the product and being found by recruiters is the whole job.
Come here if you want what you write to keep working after the feed moves on, and to be reachable by the people it reached.
Start a community, answer a question, and publish a CV anyone can open. Free.
We never quote a competitor's price, fee or user numbers, because we cannot verify them and a wrong figure would discredit the rest. Everything above is structural. See what we actually ship.
